
The need for developing new non-insecticide pest management strategies is magnified by the loss of many pesticides formerly used in animal agriculture and by the decreased pesticide development efforts by industry and an increase in arthropod pest resistance to the few remaining pesticides. The problem is further compounded by the fact that the expanding urban inhabitants have the perception that filth flies originate only on livestock and poultry farms, when in fact stable flies and house flies frequently develop in urban habitats (Broce, 1993).
Environmental and safe-food concerns by the public have triggered new and more stringent regulations by the EPA and FDA. These regulations have increased the cost of research with animals, already high when compared to crops, to the point that animal health companies are reluctant to spend the funds necessary to re-register older insecticides, particularly those for which patent rights have expired. Neither are they willing to invest resources needed to develop new insecticides for livestock pest control unless they feel the product will have broad-spectrum usage and will by widely accepted. Companies are also concerned that the use of their product does not result in rapid development of arthropod resistance. Because of these constraints, the additional pressure which will be placed on the remaining pesticides will lead to increased pesticide resistance and subsequent product failure. Therefore, the future of sustainable animal production systems requires research which promotes the development of pest management systems that do not rely solely on pesticides to prevent damage by arthropod pest populations.